Top-Ranked Tax Accountant Exam Passer Confesses to 'High-Tech Cheating'
![[Seoul=Newsis] Reporter Hwang Jun-seon = A view of a national qualification exam facility of the Korea Human Resources Development Service in Seoul on the 15th as concerns over test cheating using high-tech AI-equipped devices and AI glasses grow, with the top-ranked passer in the tax accountant exam, who was suspected of cheating after receiving near-perfect scores, admitting to using artificial intelligence (AI) and surrendering to police. 2026.11.15. hwang@newsis.com](https://www.suwonilbo.kr/img/write/pde718ea85d6de57298df7efd9a1bebc12709cc26.jpg)
An unprecedented cheating scandal has shaken the fairness of the nation's certified professional qualification exams to the core. Applicant A, who earned the distinction of top passer in the 63rd Tax Accountant Exam, has suddenly confessed to systematic cheating using high-tech electronic devices including miniature cameras and generative artificial intelligence (AI).
Applicant A, who initially appealed against the allegations by calling them "conjecture about excessively high scores," reversed his position one day later as public criticism intensified and the investigation net tightened, submitting a surrender statement to police.
'159 Out of 160 Questions Correct'—Abnormal High Score Leads to Downfall
The scandal began shortly after the announcement of final passers for the 63rd Tax Accountant Exam earlier this month in online communities of test takers. It emerged that Applicant A achieved perfect scores of 100 points in three of the four multiple-choice first exam subjects—Tax Law Introduction, Accounting Principles Introduction, and Commercial Law—getting 159 out of 160 questions correct. The testing community was swept by suspicions that such a score was "impossible without AI."
In the early stages of the controversy, Applicant A denied the allegations entirely through interviews with some media outlets, claiming to be "wronged." The Korea Human Resources Development Service, which administers the exam, also attempted damage control by stating, "No abnormalities were discovered as a result of computerized reading and answer sheet verification." However, as test takers filed information disclosure requests and audit demands, Applicant A submitted a surrender statement to the Seoul Metropolitan Police Agency's Major Crimes Investigation Division on the 15th through his attorney, admitting that both the first and second exams involved cheating using AI.
'Analog Oversight' That Couldn't Prevent Cheating Even in Front of the Examiner's Desk
The most painful aspect of this incident is the total failure of the national exam management and supervision system. According to confirmation, Applicant A was assigned to the second row during the first exam and the center of the first row during the second exam, sitting right in front of where the exam supervisors stood. Nevertheless, the supervisors detected no suspicious activity throughout the test.
Experts point out that cutting-edge devices in circulation—such as shirt button-shaped miniature cameras and bone-conduction or ultra-compact wireless earphones—have reached a level that is difficult to detect with existing visual surveillance and simple metal detectors alone. The loopholes in relying solely on analog-style human-centered supervision, without any intelligent security systems such as signal-blocking devices or frequency detection equipment within the test venue, have been fully exposed.
"Tracking Accomplices and Masterminds"… Comprehensive Overhaul of National Exam Security Paradigm Inevitable
The Seoul Metropolitan Police Agency's Major Crimes Investigation Division, which was assigned the case, is intensively investigating the exact methods of cheating and whether external accomplices or professional cheating broker organizations were involved, based on the cheating devices and surrender statement submitted by Applicant A. Related government agencies—the Ministry of Strategy and Finance, the National Tax Service, and the Korea Human Resources Development Service—have immediately begun administrative procedures to revoke Applicant A's passing status and disqualify him from taking future exams.
The government has also recognized the gravity of the situation and instructed a comprehensive audit of national qualification exams across all departments and the preparation of measures to prevent recurrence. As the rapid advancement of generative AI threatens the foundation of the nation's certification system, a comprehensive overhaul of security screening and supervision systems for all national exams, including the College Scholastic Ability Test (CSAT), is anticipated in the future.




Loading comments…